The access to the cameras from the CITY can be done ovbiously by my 2nd TP-Link mentioned, but ALSO from other_CITY/other_router or even a mobile phone (as the WAN IP of the village cameras Router is got from the NO-IP domain by browsing from every place in the world with intenet access). I am still using only the TP-Link router in the VILLAGE. Was there a particular reason you switched away from the TP-Link router? Although it doesn't appear to be supported by OpenWrt, if it was a working solution, maybe it makes sense to go back to it.That was just an idea based in the trial / error question for my peculiar problem, but never a final solution ovbiously -> my browsing refuse situation probes that OpenWRT firmware comes more secure for the PC, and with it internet traffic when browsing is less exposed Comtrend AR-5315u Router with OpenWRT firmware doesn't come from direct install adapted to solve the NOT public IP address problem with the WAN IP so that using this router the paths can NOT be browsed.Īs I said I think the OpenWRT Router I tried to use in the CITY comes with a filtering protection that prevents users to browse rare ports (different from normal http port 80), as 44 in my explanation.ĪLTHOUGH NOT RECOMMENDED for normal Router use (router could be highly exposed to abuse or hacking), I wonder what would happen if ALL firewall filtering options were removed from OpenWRT Router -> ¿would then the router allow my internet explorer browse the rare paths?.Mobile Partner software must have a way to solve the NOT public IP address problem with the WAN IP so that using directly the 3G dongle the paths can be browsed.TP-TD-W8968N Router firmware must have a method to solve the NOT public IP address problem with the WAN IP so that using this router the paths can be browsed.I am not an expert at all in routers software, but previous options are a way of probe by the trial / fail method that:

Even if I plug directly (no Router at all) the 3G USB dongle into the PC and use a Software that detects the modem (as Mobile Partner) -> -> Internet Explorer browses the 2 path and I see the village cameras.But if I replace the TD-W8968N Router with original firmware with the 'Comtrend AR-5315u' Router with OpenWRT firmware (3G dongle plugged in OpenWRT router now)-> Internet Explorer refuses to browse.It works if I plug the internet source (USB 3G dongle) into a TP-Link TD-W8968N with original TP-Link firmware and feed the Win7 PC with this router -> Internet Explorer browses the 2 path and I see the village cameras.

Thanks, my ISP can't issue me a public IP, but your suggestions 2 and 3 seem more proffesional and secure that my basic way explained -> I will try to find the time to experiment with this 2 suggested options in next months.Ĭomming back to the explained option I started explaining in this topic: I would highly appreciate some help about how to do this browsing I imagine this 'special' browsing could be done by setting adequate traffic rules, but have not found any example to experiment. Up to what I have understood this peculiar problem could not be solved by port forwarding in luCi. Here comes the hard problem for me -> although OpenWRT router allows browsing of normal sites as ' ', REFUSES 'special' previous browsing paths:Īdvanced firewall management is not easy in OpenWRT. Here comes OpenWRT -> I wondered if I could do with a OpenWRT router same as with TP-Link Router.Īfter Installing perfectly OpenWRT 19.07.3 into a 'Comtrend AR-5315u' Router (16mb 64mb 333mhz), adding 3G Usb packages and testing 3GWan works, I tried to see the cameras from Internet Explorer replacing the TP-Link Router by (OpenWRT Router with 3G USB Dongle plugged). > browse -> user + pw -> live video appears of IPCam2 > browse -> user + pw -> live video appears of IPCam1 Using a second TD-W8968N (also with 3G Usb Dongle plugged), connected to my Windows 7 PC, I can see the live captured video from village just putting following in Internet Explorer browse zone: > to view camera 2 (router forwards 4442 to 192.168.1.112 ) CITY config: I arrange port forwarding in the router to access each camera this way I use a free N0-IP account to remotely access both cameras ->

I use to connect 2 IP Cameras to the TD-W8968N router Lan Ports, and once tested software working, I remove the PC and router keeps on sending 24h/7d the video streaming by wan and 3G with little power consumption.įor the LAN config I set fixed IP in camera 1 as 192.168.1.111 and camera 2 as 192.168.1.112 I have been using TP-Link TD-W8968N v4 Routers for this purpose (with OEM TP-Link firmware) with good results to view IP Cameras located in a VILLAGE, remotely from a CITY by wan access. I usally get internet plugging a USB 3G Dongle (Huawei E173) into a Router, connected afterwards by a Lan cable to my Windows 7 PC.

No ip duc open port